Gradient Setter Performance Report

VICIdial Dialer — Straightline Framework v2.0 + SEE Training Standard — Feb 17-20, 2026
1616 Calls Scored — Full Dataset
Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026 09:03 PM — 1617 recordings (GR: 405 | DP: 1212) | 1616 transcripts | 213 scorable | 12 agents — Gisselle (173) | Sebas (124) | Tina (94) | Marco (93) | Edison (84) | Mayra (72) | Maxwell (68) | Ben (52) | Yen (37) | Darvenie (10) | Dianne (9) | Donita (5)
66%
Conversion Rate
0
Half Court Calls
19
Golden Calls
6.5
Avg Rebuttal
8.3
Avg Tonality
7.6
Avg Progression
4.7
Avg Relaxer Usage
2.2
Avg Objections Overcome / Call
81%
Objection Win Rate
Setter Rankings — Composite Score
RankSetterScoreRebuttal / Tonality / ProgressionRelaxersHalf CtGrade
🥇 Marco
67% conv | 3.0 obj won/call | 100% obj win rate | 18 IB cold, 14 conf excl | Agent 1003
9.30
Rebuttal
5.7
Tonality
7.1
Progress
7.0
3/10 2 + 1 GOLDEN A+
🥈 Edison
59% conv | 2.2 obj won/call | 87% obj win rate | 32 IB cold, 3 dead excl | Agent 1007
8.08
Rebuttal
5.1
Tonality
7.0
Progress
6.8
5/10 3 A-
🥉 Sebas
48% conv | 3.5 obj won/call | 100% obj win rate | 33 IB, 1 OB, 1 conf, 9 dead excl | Agent 1001
7.65
Rebuttal
4.5
Tonality
6.8
Progress
6.3
1/10 3 B
4 Maxwell
50% conv | 3.3 obj won/call | 100% obj win rate | 15 IB cold, 5 dead excl | Agent 1005
6.71
Rebuttal
4.9
Tonality
7.4
Progress
5.4
2/10 2 B
5 Darvenie
50% conv | -- obj data | 2 OB cold (×1.15), 1 dead excl | Agent 1011
4.74
Rebuttal
4.5
Tonality
5.5
Progress
5.5
1/10 0 C
6 Tina
58% conv (IB only) | 2.0 obj won/call | 100% obj win rate | 19 IB cold, 10 conf excl, 1 dead | Agent 1002
4.54
Rebuttal
3.8
Tonality
6.5
Progress
7.0
1/10 0 C
7 Mayra
44% conv | 0.0 obj won/call | 0% obj win rate | 20 IB cold, 1 dead excl | Agent 1006
4.50
Rebuttal
3.0
Tonality
4.9
Progress
5.5
0/10 1 C-
8 Gisselle
30% conv (IB only) | 1.3 obj won/call | 50% obj win rate | 17 IB cold, 5 conf excl, 11 dead | Agent 1004
3.24
Rebuttal
2.8
Tonality
5.1
Progress
4.5
0/10 0 D
9 Donita
0% conv | 0.0 obj won/call | 0% obj win rate | 2 OB cold (×1.15) | Agent 1012
2.45
Rebuttal
2.5
Tonality
3.0
Progress
2.5
0/10 0 F
10 Yen
0% conv | -- obj data | 2 OB cold (×1.15), 2 dead excl | Agent 1013
2.42
Rebuttal
2.0
Tonality
3.5
Progress
2.5
0/10 0 F
11 Ben
0% conv | 0.0 obj won/call | 0% obj win rate | 22 OB cold (×1.15), 1 dead excl | Agent 1008
2.42
Rebuttal
2.0
Tonality
3.0
Progress
3.0
0/10 0 F
Golden Call — Elite Performance Under Pressure (+2.0 Bonus)
Marco → Lead #892425 IB Cold GOLDEN CALL
A+
Feb 19 | ~15 min | 5 objections overcome | ORA: 7 | Tone: 8 | Prog: 9 | Script: 95% | Composite: 11.75
Best solar economics explanation across ALL 239 transcripts. Lead asked "How much?" — Marco didn't dodge. Explained ownership vs lease, net metering, and EV plan implications in plain English. Overcame 5 objections (work schedule, company identity, cost concern, rooftop vs community, EV plan) without a single flinch. Set same-day 6pm appointment for a working homeowner. This is the standard every setter should study.
Training Value: Only Golden Call in the entire dataset. Primary example for how to handle the "How much does it cost?" objection honestly without losing the lead.
Half-Court Calls — Difficult Turn Arounds
#1 Maxwell w/ Lead #703140 IB Cold HALF COURT
B
Feb 18 | ~15 min | 4 objections overcome | ORA: 6 | Tone: 9 | Prog: 8 | Script: 95%
Lead asked "Is this a scam?" — Maxwell responded: "Well it's not much of a scam if they put it up there for free." Humor defused all tension. Also handled property value concern, lifespan objection ("don't plan on living 30 years" — warranty transfers to children), and prior broken promise from another company. Lead went from suspicious to scheduling appointment.
Training Value: Best scam rebuttal across all 239 recordings. Primary example for humor-based objection handling.
#2 Maxwell w/ Lead #360632 IB Cold B
Feb 17 | ~20 min | 4 objections overcome | ORA: 6 | Tone: 8 | Prog: 9 | Script: 95%
Completely cold, skeptical lead with bad previous solar experience. Overcame manufactured home (ground mount on 85 acres), previous company lies, age/ROI concern (60+ with 25-year payoff — explained 12-15yr ROI), and cold-call skepticism. Natural conversational tone throughout.
#3 Edison w/ Lead #302222 IB Cold B
Feb 17 | ~20 min | 3 objections overcome | ORA: 7 | Tone: 7 | Prog: 8 | Script: 95%
Overcame 3 scheduling obstacles: heading to funeral, traveling 2 weeks, cousin pays bills. Pivoted to phone consultation. Good relaxer usage ("I totally understand how that goes"). Created urgency around incentive expiration date.
#4 Edison w/ Lead #459029 IB Cold B
Feb 18 | ~18 min | 3 objections overcome | ORA: 7 | Tone: 7 | Prog: 9 | Script: 95%
Lead had panels installed by previous company that lied about coverage and never finished. Edison rebuilt trust: written agreements, full assessment, 100% coverage requirement. Confirmed Tri County utility qualifies for net metering.
#5 Sebas w/ Lead #393826 IB Cold B
Feb 17 | ~18 min | 4 objections overcome | ORA: 6 | Tone: 7 | Prog: 8 | Script: 90%
Overcame "I'm not buying any solar panels" by presenting free lease option. Navigated emotional situation (recently widowed), previous bad company experience, and scheduling conflicts. Offered ground mount on 5 acres when roof wouldn't work. Showed genuine empathy.
Top Calls — Individual Breakdown
Maxwell → Lead #703140 IB Cold HALF COURT
Feb 18 | ~15 min | 4 objections | Script: 95%
B
6
Rebuttal
9
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 95% (7/7 phases)
Is this a scam? - WONPrior broken promise - WONProperty value concern - WONDon't plan on living 30 years - WON
"Not much of a scam if they put it up there for free" — humor-based rebuttal that defused all tension
Maxwell → Lead #360632 IB Cold HALF COURT
Feb 17 | ~20 min | 4 objections | Script: 95%
B
6
Rebuttal
8
Tonality
9
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 95% (7/7 phases)
Manufactured home - WONBad prior experience - WONAge/ROI concern - WONCold call skepticism - WON
Ground mount on 85 acres for trailer. Both ownership and lease options presented. Natural conversational tone.
Maxwell → Lead #464848 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~10 min | Appt Set | Script: 90%
B
4
Rebuttal
8
Tonality
9
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 90% (6/7)
Solar farm vs residential - WONResidential only? - WON
$378/month bill. Distinguished solar farm contract from residential. Mentioned cash incentive, powerwall, rate protection.
Marco → Lead #892425 IB Cold GOLDEN CALL
Feb 19 | ~15 min | Appt Set | Script: 95% | Composite: 11.75
A+
7
Rebuttal
8
Tonality
9
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 95% (7/7)
Work all day - WONWhat company? - WONSolar costs more than $4000 - WONRooftop vs community? - WONEV plan concern - WON
Best solar economics explanation across ALL 239 transcripts. Didn't oversimplify or dodge cost question. Set same-day 6pm for working homeowner.
Marco → Lead #290488 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~15 min | Appt Set | Script: 85%
B
5
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 85% (6/7)
What does it cost? - WONBusy today - WON
"If you wouldn't qualify we would not encourage solar" — trust-building cost rebuttal. Same-day 4:30pm appointment.
Sebas → Lead #393826 IB Cold HALF COURT
Feb 17 | ~18 min | Appt Set | Script: 90%
B
6
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 90% (7/7)
Roof won't work - WONI'm not buying panels - WONBusy with taxes - WONRecently widowed - WON
Free lease option overcame "I'm not buying panels." Ground mount on 5 acres. Genuine empathy for widowed lead.
Sebas → Lead #560406 IB Cold
Feb 18 | ~18 min | Appt Set | Script: 90%
B
5
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 90% (7/7)
HOA restrictions - WONHow much money? - WONOwning advantage? - WON
Most detailed ownership vs lease explanation across all transcripts. Neighbors have panels, HOA can't ban by law.
Edison → Lead #459029 IB Cold HALF COURT
Feb 18 | ~18 min | Appt Set | Script: 95%
B
7
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
9
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 95% (7/7)
Previous company lied - WONDifferent utility - WONWon't meet today - WON
Rebuilt trust after prior company lied about coverage and never finished. Written agreements, full assessment, 100% coverage requirement.
Edison → Lead #302222 IB Cold HALF COURT
Feb 17 | ~20 min | Phone Consultation | Script: 95%
B
7
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 95% (7/7)
Out of town 2 weeks - WONNo bills on hand - WONHeaded to funeral - WON
"I totally understand how that goes" — good relaxer. Pivoted to phone consult. Urgency around incentive expiration.
Edison → Lead #824766 IB Cold
Feb 19 | ~12 min | Appt Set | Script: 90%
B
6
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 90% (7/7)
System failure concern - WONWhat rebates? - WONTransfer failed - WON
Thorough warranty/insurance/grid backup explanation. Lead is 80, wife 63 — strong senior benefits. Monday 12pm appointment.
Edison → Lead #481543 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~18 min | Not Interested | Script: 55%
C
6
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
6
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 55% (4/7)
Bad prior experience - WONDifferent utility - WONNot available until April - LOSTMinnesota number suspicious - WON
Spent 18 minutes on clearly unschedulable lead. Should have qualified availability earlier.
Edison → Lead #427537 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~3 min | Not Interested | Script: 15%
D
2
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
3
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 15% (1/7)
Not interested - LOST
No relaxer used. Gave up after one attempt. Should have tried "A lot of people tell me that" before pivoting.
Gisselle → Lead #827849 IB Cold
Feb 19 | ~15 min | Appt Set | Script: 80%
C
5
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
7
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 80% (6/7)
Just out of hospital - WONTrees in back - WONUnknown credit - WON
Lead just had leg amputation. Handled with appropriate care. Set same-day 3:30pm. Money-saving angle resonated.
Gisselle → Lead #990506 IB Cold
Feb 19 | ~12 min | Soft Set | Script: 55%
C
4
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
5
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 55% (4/7)
Rental property shading - WONNeed to check with wife - LOSTWhat's the benefit/ROI? - LOST
Lost near-set by insisting both spouses be present. Lead said "let me call my wife." Should set with whoever is available.
Tina → Lead #360905 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~10 min | Appt Set | Script: 80%
C
4
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
7
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 80% (6/7)
Not available until Thursday - WONOld bankruptcy 2013 - WON
$300-600 bills but Tina didn't capitalize on savings potential. Adequate but missed value raising opportunity.
Mayra → Lead #363757 IB Cold
Feb 17 | ~6 min | Not Interested | Script: 40%
D
2
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
5
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 40% (3/7)
Both 70, don't want to schedule - LOST
WORST MISSED OPPORTUNITY: $300/month bill, 800+ credit, metal roof, no trees — fully qualified. Mayra said "I understand" and gave up. Zero relaxers. Zero value raising.
Ben → Lead #466875 OB Cold
Feb 18 | ~3 min | Scam Accusation | Script: 10%
F
2
Rebuttal
3
Tonality
2
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 10% (1/7)
English is broken - LOSTThis is a scam - LOST
Lead said "your English is very broken." Generic scam rebuttal didn't land. Accent is the primary barrier.
Donita → Lead #7510 OB Cold
Feb 19 | ~2 min | Quick Hangup | Script: 10%
F
1
Rebuttal
5
Tonality
2
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 10% (1/7)
Is this solar stuff? - LOST
"Capitol Energy" opener hides that it's solar. When revealed, lead hung up. Should use SEE standard "Solar Rebate Program."
Edison → James Vandiver #688061 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Kentucky 40165 | $175/mo LG&E | Widower age 67 | Appt Set 12:30 Today
B
4
Rebuttal
7
Tonality
8
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 75% (6/8)
Full script execution: opener → qualify → satellite check → value raising (savings, rate protection, sell excess) → scheduling → appointment set same day. Smooth handoff to Marco on scheduling team. Lead was cooperative throughout.
Marco → James Vandiver #688061 CONF
Feb 20 | Kentucky | Confirmation call | Excluded from scoring
EXCL
Not scored — confirmation/warm transfer call. Excluded from composite, averages, and rankings per call type policy. Marco handled a cost objection (“If this costs me $1.01, I’m not interested”) and maintained the appointment.
Marco → Kaple #954982 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Georgia 30319 | $350/mo Georgia Power | Trees concern | No Appt
C
3
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
5
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 50% (4/8)
$350/mo lead with clear roof — deferred to "consultant will look into it." Should have pushed for evaluation appointment and let the technician assess trees on-site.
Gisselle → Lead #545717 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Kentucky 40216 | LG&E | Comprehension issue | Appt Set 6:00 PM
C
4
Rebuttal
4
Tonality
5
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 63% (5/8)
"I can't understand you" - WON"I'm not familiar with this" - WON
Lead initially couldn't understand Gisselle. Persisted through skepticism: "Allied Energy, approved contractor by LG&E... no cost, no obligation, information visit." Got appointment despite rough start.
Gisselle → Lead #574784 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Kentucky 42701 | Disabled, wife handles finances | Lead backed out
D
2
Rebuttal
4
Tonality
4
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 38% (3/8)
"Panels cost me" - LOST"I don't really need that" - LOST
Lead was disabled, 62, wife handles all bills. Didn't know electric amount. When lead asked about panel costs, Gisselle gave vague "depends on what you qualify for" instead of strong no-cost reassurance. Lead opted out.
Mayra → Lead #1825880 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Michigan 49079 | $250-300/mo | 10 acres | DNQ — back taxes
DNQ
Not scored — lead disqualified (owes back taxes). DNQ calls are excluded from setter performance metrics per policy.
Said "This one is not going anywhere" while still on the line. Also said "four years" for bankruptcy requirement instead of the correct seven years per SEE script. $250-300/mo bill with 10 acres was a strong lead before DNQ.
Mayra → Lead #839371 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Georgia 30354 | Prior eval rejected (trees) | Deferred to manager
D
2
Rebuttal
4
Tonality
3
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 50% (4/8)
Lead was previously rejected for trees. Mayra checked address and immediately gave up: "Let me talk to my managers." Should have explored ground mount, tree trimming, or partial shade solutions. Quick surrender on a retrievable lead.
Sebas → Mackie #789759 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Georgia 30236 | Prior eval denied financing | Callback requested
C
4
Rebuttal
6
Tonality
4
Progression
SCRIPT COMPLETION: 50% (4/8)
Lead was previously denied financing. Sebas (as "Josh") pivoted well: "You can finance if you want to own, but they can also put them up for free... much lower rate for electricity." Good PPA/lease alternative pitch. Lead busy, agreed to 30-min callback.
Sebas → Mackie #789759 (Callback) IB Cold
Feb 20 | Georgia | Credit below 650 | DNQ
DNQ
Not scored — lead disqualified (credit below 650). DNQ calls are excluded from setter performance metrics per policy.
Callback from prior call. Completed qualify (no trees, $100/mo, taxes current) but credit below 650. Handled gracefully: "Let me find out with my manager, see if there's any other options... I wouldn't wanna waste your time."
Tina → Mrs. Foster #2019598 CONF
Feb 20 | Reschedule | Missed prior Monday appt | Excluded from scoring
EXCL
Not scored — reschedule/confirmation call. Excluded from composite, averages, and rankings per call type policy. Professional reschedule of a missed appointment — confirmed Monday 4PM.
Tina → Lead #634822 IB Cold
Feb 20 | Kentucky 40160 | $400/mo LG&E | Credit DNQ
DNQ
Not scored — lead disqualified (credit below 650). DNQ calls are excluded from setter performance metrics per policy.
$400/mo bill — one of the highest in the dataset. Thorough qualify (ownership, home type, roof, trees, address correction) but stalled at credit check. Lead appears below 650 credit.
Systemic Issues — Team-Wide Patterns
HIGH
Opener Inconsistency — Two Distinct Scripts
Experienced setters (Edison, Maxwell, Sebas, Marco, Tina, Mayra) use SEE standard: "Solar Rebate Program." Offshore setters (Ben, Donita, Darvenie, Yen) use vague "Capitol Energy" / "energy update" — confuses leads and triggers scam suspicion. This split is the primary driver of the two-tier performance divide.
HIGH
Accent/Clarity Barrier for Offshore Agents
Ben, Yen, Darvenie, and Donita create immediate trust barriers. Ben's accent was explicitly called out ("your English is very broken"). This is the single biggest factor in their zero-appointment rate. Options: accent coaching, reassign to scheduling confirmation, simplify scripts, pair with domestic closer.
MEDIUM
Relaxers Almost Never Used — <5 Times in 257 Calls
SEE training requires 3 relaxers per objection before value raising. Across 142 scorable calls, relaxers were used fewer than 5 times. Most setters skip directly from objection to pitch. Only Edison used them with any consistency. Mandatory relaxer training needed.
MEDIUM
Value Raising is Inconsistent
Only Edison, Maxwell, and Marco consistently mention: fixed payment, rate protection, net metering credits, $4000 incentive. Mayra, Gisselle, and offshore agents barely use these. Create a mandatory 6-point value raising checklist.
MEDIUM
Spouse/Decision-Maker Objection Kills Sales
Gisselle lost near-set (#990506) by insisting both spouses be present. No setter had a strong recovery for "I need to check with my spouse." Train specific rebuttal: "Totally fine if just one is there. Technician can follow up with spouse."
MEDIUM
Transfer to Scheduling Team Failures
Multiple calls (Sebas, Edison) had technical transfer issues. Setters arranged callbacks instead — risk of lead not answering. Investigate VICIdial conference/transfer configuration.
LOW
Timezone Management Failure
Ben called lead at 1am their time (#406410). VICIdial hopper/filter configuration issue, not setter error. Verify timezone-based call filtering.
SEE Sales Training Standard — Objection Playbook
Source: SEE Solar Setter Script Training v1.3 (Feb 2026) — Not a rigid script, but the standard for how to handle objections and progress calls
The 6-Step Process
1. Script Ready 2. Ready for Objections 3. Use 3 Relaxers 4. Value Raising 5. Rebuttals 6. Back to Pitch
11 Relaxers (Use 3 per objection)
"Believe me I understand" • "I would feel the same way" • "A lot of people tell me that" • "That's a great question, glad you brought that up" • "I love your honesty" • "I wouldn't expect you to feel any other way" • "Let me ask you a question..." • "That is exactly why I am calling you" • "Oh really? Tell me more about that" • "And I appreciate that..." • "I completely understand..."
Objection Playbook vs. Actual Setter Behavior
ObjectionTraining SaysWhat We Heard in Calls
"Not Interested" Relaxer + "Most people aren't until they hear how much the utility is overcharging them" + Value Raising about savings Edison (427537) Gave up after one attempt.
Mayra (363757) Said "I understand" on $300/month fully-qualified lead. Worst missed opportunity.
"Is This a Scam?" Relaxer + "We are a contractors association working with [utility] — why would they partner with a scam?" Maxwell (703140) Perfect: "Not much of a scam if they put it up for free." Best scam rebuttal in all 239 calls.
Ben (466875) Generic "I assure you we are not scam" — didn't land.
"How Much?" Relaxer + "Too many factors — that's why the technician comes out. No out-of-pocket with incentives." Marco (892425) Best economics explanation across all transcripts. Didn't dodge the question.
Sebas (560406) Most detailed ownership vs lease comparison.
"Need to Check with Spouse" Not explicitly covered — gap in current training Gisselle (990506) Insisted both be present — killed the sale. No setter had a strong recovery. Training needs a specific rebuttal.
"Bad Prior Experience" Relaxer + "That's exactly why we do things differently — written agreement, full assessment before commitment" Edison (459029) Strong — differentiated program, emphasized written agreements.
Maxwell (360632) Both ownership and lease options to address prior lies.
"I'm Busy" Relaxer + "I'll be brief. Just want to see if you qualify for incentives." Mayra (455835) Adapted well — condensed pitch, found narrow window.
Darvenie (5120) Got callback commitment after 5pm.
5 Value Raising Statements
1. Lock in a fixed lower payment that never increases and eventually disappears
2. Rate protection from utility increases — you're giving a blank check to the utility right now
3. Sell excess electricity back to the grid via net metering
4. $4,000 cash incentive available for qualified homeowners
5. 4% property value increase — FREE, no-obligation energy assessment
KEY TRAINING RULE
After addressing any objection with Relaxers + Value Raising + Rebuttal, go back to the pitch as if the objection never happened. Most setters stop progressing after an objection. Only Maxwell, Marco, and Edison demonstrated this consistently across the full 239-call dataset.
Conversations to Completion Ratio
SetterConversion RateAvg Obj Won/CallObj Win RateHC CallsGolden
Marco (14 conf excl)73%3.0100%21
Tina (10 conf excl)58%2.0100%00
Edison59%2.287%30
Maxwell50%3.3100%20
Darvenie50%00
Sebas48%3.5100%30
Mayra44%0.00%10
Gisselle (5 conf, 11 dead excl)30%1.350%00
Ben0%0.00%00
Yen0%00
Donita0%0.00%00
Key Insight (Call Type Bucketing Applied): Tina’s 95% and Marco’s 73% are inflated by confirmation calls that were scored before bucketing. Tina has 10 confirmation calls (33% of her transcripts) and Marco has 14 (44%). After excluding confirmations, only IB Cold and OB Cold calls count. Edison (32 IB, 0 conf) and Sebas (33 IB, 1 conf) have the cleanest sales-only datasets. Gisselle has the most dead calls (11) and 5 confirmations — only 52% of her transcripts are real sales. All offshore agents (Ben 22, Yen 2, Darvenie 2, Donita 2) do OB Cold exclusively (×1.15 weight). DNQ + confirmation + dead calls are all excluded from scoring.
Tips for Agents
Maxwell | B | 8.14 | 50% conversion
Keep doing: Your satellite imagery usage is the best credibility tool on the team. On call #454498 you pulled up the lead's roof mid-conversation and they immediately went from skeptical to cooperative. Your scam-objection rebuttal on that same call (9.75 composite) is the best single rebuttal in the entire dataset — you validated the concern, pivoted to government rebate language, and closed the appointment in under 2 minutes. Keep doing that exact sequence.

Work on:
Hot mic discipline. Call #26230 (Feb 20) recorded you having a personal conversation about Donna Summer lyrics while the line was open. Multiple other recordings caught background chatter. The mic is always live — treat every second like the lead can hear you.
Stop offering to "send literature." When a lead hesitates, you default to mailing info instead of fighting for the appointment. Literature doesn't close — once they hang up, that lead is dead. Push for the appointment: "Rather than mail something, let me get a technician out there so you can see the real numbers for your roof."
Relaxers. Even at your level, you rarely use them. Adding "That's a great question" or "I completely understand" before your already-strong rebuttals would make them land even harder.
Marco | B | 7.05 | 73% conversion
Keep doing: You have the best overall balance on the team — 73% set rate, 2 Half-Court calls, and the only Golden Call (#892425). On that Golden Call you gave the most detailed and honest solar economics breakdown in the dataset, walking the lead through net metering, rate protection, and the $4,000 incentive without sounding scripted. Your confirmation call for Vandiver (Feb 20) showed strong objection handling when the lead pushed back on the "$1.01 cost" — you pivoted cleanly to no-cost ownership.

Work on:
Relaxers before rebuttals. You handle objections well but jump straight into the counter-pitch. On call #954982 (Kaple, Feb 20) the lead had tree concerns and you went right to problem-solving without acknowledging the concern first. Start with "Believe me I understand" before pivoting — it takes 2 seconds and lowers their guard.
Fight harder on scheduling blocks. When a lead says "call me back" or "I'm busy," you tend to accept it. Try: "I totally get it — let me just lock in a 10-minute window so you don't miss the incentive deadline." Converting a "call back" into a booked slot is the difference between B and A grade.
Stay anchored on longer calls. You occasionally drift mid-conversation on calls over 5 minutes. Use your qualify checklist as a mental anchor to keep progression moving forward.
Edison | B | 7.19 | 59% conversion
Keep doing: You're the only setter on this team who uses relaxers at all — that alone sets you apart. Your satellite imagery usage creates instant proof and your 3 Half-Court calls show you can convert genuinely resistant leads. On the Vandiver call (Feb 20, #688061) you got a skeptical lead with a $175/mo bill all the way to a 12:30 appointment by staying patient and methodical through the full qualify sequence.

Work on:
Use relaxers consistently, not occasionally. You use them maybe every 3rd objection. Make it every single one. The leads where you DO use relaxers convert at a noticeably higher rate than the ones where you skip straight to rebuttal.
Hit all 6 value raising points. You mention the no-cost aspect consistently but rarely hit the $4,000 cash incentive, rate protection, or property value increase. These are the points that push a "maybe" into a "yes." Work them into your qualify-to-schedule transition.
Legitimacy challenges. When leads question who you are or say "this sounds like a scam," lean into the government rebate angle harder and pull up the satellite imagery earlier. Your imagery is your best weapon — use it before they get suspicious, not after.
Sebas | C+ | 6.13 | 48% conversion
Keep doing: You hit 100% script completion on every appointment call and your delivery is the most consistent on the team — same structure, same pacing, every time. Your 3 Half-Court calls prove you can handle real resistance. On the Mackie call (Feb 20, #789759) you pivoted well from a financing denial to a PPA/lease alternative: "You can finance if you want to own, but they can also put them up for free... much lower rate for electricity." That's exactly the kind of creative reframing that turns a dead lead into a callback.

Work on:
ORA is your weakest score (4.5/10). You accept soft rejections without pushing back. When a lead says "I'm not interested," you tend to say "Okay, no problem" instead of using the SEE rebuttal: "Which are you not interested in — making money, or cleaning the air?" That one line would change your conversion rate overnight.
Zero relaxers across 21 scored calls. This is the single biggest gap in your game. Before any rebuttal, start with "Believe me I understand" or "I would feel the same way." It takes 2 seconds and it's the difference between the lead hearing your rebuttal vs. shutting you out.
Don't let qualified leads walk. You let a $350/mo fully-qualified lead leave without a single rebuttal attempt. That's a closer's dream lead. Any lead over $200/mo who passes qualify deserves a minimum of 2 rebuttal attempts before you let them go.
Tina | C+ | 5.67 | 95% conversion
Keep doing: Highest set rate on the team (95%). Your script execution is near-perfect — you never miss a phase on willing leads. You never lose composure, your credit score judgment is solid, and your qualifying sequence is thorough. On the Foster reschedule (Feb 20, #2019598) you handled a missed appointment cleanly — quickly identified the issue, offered same-day or Monday, confirmed 4PM, and asked the lead to save the calendar date.

Work on:
Zero Half-Court calls = you only convert willing leads. Your 95% set rate looks great but it's entirely on leads who were already leaning yes. The moment someone pushes back, you fold. Start attempting rebuttals on resistant leads even if you don't convert — the practice builds the muscle. Try one rebuttal per objection this week, even if it feels uncomfortable.
Zero relaxers across 19 calls. You go straight from objection to pitch. Add "I completely understand" before every rebuttal attempt. It's one phrase that changes how the lead receives your next sentence.
Learn to improvise. Your script-reading is audible — educated and skeptical leads pick up on it immediately and shut down. Practice the opener and qualify phases conversationally until they sound natural, not mechanical. Record yourself and listen back — if you can hear the script, the lead can too.
Confirmation calls inflate your numbers. 7 of your 18 appointments are transferred or rescheduled appointments, not cold sets. Focus energy on converting NEW leads from cold — that's where the real growth is.
Darvenie | C | 5.39 | 50% conversion
Keep doing: Most promising of the offshore agents. Your opener structure is clean, your qualification sequence is methodical, and your delivery is controlled and intelligible — much clearer than the other offshore setters. Small sample size, but the foundation is there to build on.

Work on:
Memorize 3 relaxers this week and use them on every call. Zero relaxer usage so far. Start with: "Believe me I understand" / "That's a great question" / "A lot of people tell me that." Use one before every rebuttal, no exceptions.
Don't fold on DQ objections. When a lead might not qualify, you give up instead of pivoting. Try: "Let's have the technician take a look anyway — there might be other options for your situation."
Add value raising. You qualify well but never tell the lead WHY solar benefits them. After qualifying, hit at least 3 of the 6 value points: $4,000 incentive, fixed payments, rate protection. This is the bridge between qualifying and scheduling.
Mayra | C | 4.76 | 44% conversion
Keep doing: Your satellite/map verification for shading is a genuine strength — you catch tree issues early which protects closer time. Your DNC handling is professional. Your borderline bill recovery technique (asking for 12-month average instead of accepting a low number) works when you use it.

Work on:
FIGHT for your leads. On call #363757 you let a $300/mo fully-qualified lead — owned home, good roof, no trees — walk away without a SINGLE rebuttal. That's the biggest missed opportunity in the entire dataset. A closer would have killed for that lead. Any objection from a qualified lead deserves a minimum of 2 rebuttal attempts.
Zero relaxers + zero value raising = no tools. You have nothing between "qualify" and "give up." Memorize 3 relaxers and 3 value raising points this week. Use them on EVERY call, even the ones that feel like dead ends. You can't improve without reps.
Fix your tonality (4.9/10). You sound like you're reading a script — low energy, flat delivery. Practice the opener and qualify until they sound conversational. Record yourself, listen back, and compare to how Marco or Maxwell sound.
Never say negative things on a live line. On call #1825880 (Feb 20) you said "This one is not going anywhere" while the lead could still hear you. You also quoted "four years" for the bankruptcy requirement instead of the correct seven per SEE script. Both are fixable with practice.
Gisselle | C- | 3.88 | 42% conversion
Keep doing: You can complete appointments on cooperative leads. 10 appointments from 24 scored calls shows the basic mechanics are there. On call #545717 (Feb 20) you recovered from a rough start where the lead couldn't understand you and still got a 6PM appointment.

Work on:
Pick one name and stick with it. You introduce yourself as both Gisselle and Michelle across different calls. Identity confusion immediately kills trust. Choose one and use it every single time.
Learn the spouse objection rebuttal. On call #990506 you lost a near-set by insisting both spouses be present. The fix is simple: "Totally fine if just one of you is there — the technician can follow up with your spouse afterward." The goal is getting someone in the home, not both on the phone.
Don't go silent when you don't know an answer. On call #574784 (Feb 20) the lead asked about panel costs and you gave a vague "depends on what you qualify for" instead of a strong no-cost reassurance. When unsure, say "Great question, let me check on that" — dead air is a dead lead.
Stop over-qualifying on credit. You're killing warm transfers by asking credit questions too aggressively upfront. Let borderline leads through to the closer — they have more tools to work with.
Zero relaxers + zero value raising. Same prescription: memorize 3 of each and use them every call this week.
Ben | F | 1.55 | 0% conversion
Keep doing: You stay professional even when leads are hostile. You don't get rude or argumentative, which is a baseline that some agents don't even hit.

Work on:
Accent is your #1 barrier. A lead on call #406410 explicitly said "your English is very broken." This creates an instant trust wall that no script can overcome. Consider accent reduction coaching, or reassignment to scheduling confirmation where the lead already agreed to the appointment and cold-call resistance isn't a factor.
86% dead call rate (19 of 22 calls). Most of your calls never become conversations. The first 10 seconds decide everything — practice your opener until it's crisp, clear, and confident. Record it 50 times and listen back.
Switch from "Capitol Energy" to "Solar Rebate Program." Your vague opener triggered multiple "this is a scam" accusations. The SEE standard opener is clear and legitimate-sounding: "Hi, this is [name] with the Solar Rebate Program."
Attempt at least ONE rebuttal before accepting rejection. You fold at the first "not interested." Even if the rebuttal doesn't convert, the practice builds the muscle you need.
Yen | F | 1.65 | 0% conversion
Keep doing: Polite demeanor and you attempt value mentions occasionally, which is more than some offshore agents do.

Work on:
First 15 seconds are everything. Leads disconnect before you get to qualify because the opener doesn't land. Slow down, enunciate each word, and practice the opener 50 times until it's crisp. Your pace is too fast for leads to process.
Fix run-on sentences. Your sentence construction makes it hard to follow. Use short, punchy statements — one idea per sentence. Instead of chaining clauses together, pause after each point and let the lead respond.
Switch to "Solar Rebate Program" opener. The vague "Capitol Energy / energy update" intro triggers immediate scam suspicion. Clear opener = more leads staying on the line.
Try ONE rebuttal before accepting "not interested." You currently fold at the first sign of resistance. One attempt is all it takes to start building the habit.
Donita | F | 1.85 | 0% conversion
Keep doing: Small sample size — only 2 calls scored, so there's room to improve with coaching and more reps.

Work on:
Your opener sounds like a bill collector. Leads go defensive immediately because they can't tell what you're calling about. Rewrite to the SEE standard: "Hi, this is [name] with the Solar Rebate Program." Say it clearly and with energy — you want the lead to hear "rebate" and "program," not a vague company name.
Lead with the value, not the mystery. You bury the solar pitch until the lead drags it out of you. Flip it: open with the benefit. "We're reaching out to homeowners in your zip code who qualify for a government solar rebate." Now they know why you're calling and they have a reason to stay on.
Accent coaching. Like Ben, comprehension is a genuine barrier. Consider accent reduction or reassignment to a role with less cold-call resistance (scheduling confirmations, data verification).
Memorize 3 relaxers and use them. Zero relaxers, zero value raising, zero persistence on objections. Start with the basics: learn 3 relaxers and use one before every rebuttal, even if it feels forced at first. The habit has to start somewhere.